領域外・複数領域(M)
セッション小記号その他(ZZ)
セッションIDM-ZZ54
タイトル和文Communicating Hazard and Risk: What do we know about how to make this information understandable?
英文Communicating Hazard and Risk: What do we know about how to make this information understandable?
タイトル短縮名和文Communicating Hazard and Risk
英文Communicating Hazard and Risk
代表コンビーナ氏名和文Schorlemmer Danijel
英文Danijel Schorlemmer
所属和文GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
英文GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
共同コンビーナ 1氏名和文Alexandra Freeman
英文Alexandra Freeman
所属和文Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge
英文Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge
共同コンビーナ 2氏名和文Sarah Dryhurst
英文Sarah Dryhurst
所属和文University of Cambridge
英文University of Cambridge
共同コンビーナ 3氏名和文平田 直
英文Naoshi Hirata
所属和文東京大学地震研究所
英文Earthquake Research Institute, the University of Tokyo
発表言語E
スコープ和文There is no point modelling hazards and risks if that information is of no use to decision makers (at individual and policy levels including the scientific community, the public, governmental institutions, engineers, policy makers, emergency and resilience managers). We therefore have to ensure that we are providing the information focusing on the needs of these stakeholders, in a format and time frame that is of use to them, minimizing the possibility of misunderstanding or misperception.

In this session we aim at addressing the problems surrounding communicating hazard and risk of natural catastrophes. Important questions include: who are the key stakeholders for each kind of information? What information does each require? How do we balance the trade-off between restricting the information provided to improve comprehension versus the ethics of withholding information? How do we approach the boundary between providing information and providing advice? How do we communicate the different uncertainties (both epistemic and aleatory)? What can be learned about the communication of geospatially- and temporally-dynamic data from other fields (such as meteorology, military defence etc.) and how should we communicate in ongoing crises, in particular during unexpected changes in the development of catastrophic events? How do we ensure our communications are trustworthy? What are the metrics of success in such communications?

We will be considering all time frames and stages of hazard assessment from long-term maps and planning to emergency warning and rapid loss assessment when an event occurs. This includes all possible communication channels (e.g. scientific publications, public or press announcements, social networks, TV, radio, newsletters) and/or content types (e.g. text, video, graphics).

We solicit contributions from all fields with the aim of bringing together a variety of researchers to share their experiences from their respective fields.
英文There is no point modelling hazards and risks if that information is of no use to decision makers (at individual and policy levels including the scientific community, the public, governmental institutions, engineers, policy makers, emergency and resilience managers). We therefore have to ensure that we are providing the information focusing on the needs of these stakeholders, in a format and time frame that is of use to them, minimizing the possibility of misunderstanding or misperception.

In this session we aim at addressing the problems surrounding communicating hazard and risk of natural catastrophes. Important questions include: who are the key stakeholders for each kind of information? What information does each require? How do we balance the trade-off between restricting the information provided to improve comprehension versus the ethics of withholding information? How do we approach the boundary between providing information and providing advice? How do we communicate the different uncertainties (both epistemic and aleatory)? What can be learned about the communication of geospatially- and temporally-dynamic data from other fields (such as meteorology, military defence etc.) and how should we communicate in ongoing crises, in particular during unexpected changes in the development of catastrophic events? How do we ensure our communications are trustworthy? What are the metrics of success in such communications?

We will be considering all time frames and stages of hazard assessment from long-term maps and planning to emergency warning and rapid loss assessment when an event occurs. This includes all possible communication channels (e.g. scientific publications, public or press announcements, social networks, TV, radio, newsletters) and/or content types (e.g. text, video, graphics).

We solicit contributions from all fields with the aim of bringing together a variety of researchers to share their experiences from their respective fields.
発表方法口頭および（または）ポスターセッション